Volume 29, Issue 5, 2020
DOI: 10.24205/03276716.2020.1131
Comparative Clinical, Radiographic and Histomorphometrical Assessment Between Two Different Xenografts in The Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation During Dental Implants Procedure
Abstract
Aim and Objective: The objective of the study was to compare clinical, radiographic, and histomorphometrically parameters of maxillary sinus lift using Lumina-Bone Porous® against those of Bio-Oss® in a split-mouth model through the sinus lift technique.
Materials and Methods: A total of 83 patients underwent implant dentistry program were included in the study. 1–2 mm granules of Bio-Oss® Large (BO cohort; n = 41) or Lumina-Bone Porous® (LB cohort; n = 42) was used for the sinus lift technique. The clinical, radiographic, and histomorphometrically parameters were collected and evaluated.
Results: Six-months after sinus lift the bone ridge heights were 9.89 ± 2.11 mm and 9.31 ± 2.23 mm for BO and LB cohorts (p = 0.228). The rate of survival of implants was the same between both cohorts (100 % vs. 93 %, p = 0.241). There was no statistical difference reported between BO and LB cohorts for histomorphometrically evaluation (p> 0.05 for all parameters).
Conclusion: Both Lumina-Bone Porous and Bio-Oss Large can be used for reconstructive procedures in sinus lift.
Keywords
Bio-Oss; Dental implant; Lumina-Bone Porous; Sinus lift procedure; Xenograft